The researchers collated data from 116 pharmacy request forms and compared them with 87 requests for emergency contraception from two of the busiest family members planning treatment centers in the principal Care Trust region. ‘Our study suggests that community pharmacists are providing a valuable role in preventing undesirable pregnancies by providing the morning-after tablet and backing this up with information on contraception and sexual wellness’ says Gaye Lewington from SouthWest Kent Primary Care Trust, which oversees and commissions local health services in the certain area.But these addresses had been ones he created, so the requests to review went right to him or his co-workers. The fallout from Moon’s confession: 28 articles in various journals released by Informa were retracted, and one editor resigned. An editor at among the journals released by Sage Publications became suspicious, sparking a thorough and lengthy investigation, which resulted in the retraction of 60 articles in July 2014. By the end of 2014, BioMed Central and other publishers alerted the international Committee on Publication Ethics to new types of systematic attempts to manipulate journals’ peer-review processes. According to a statement published on COPE’s website in January 2015, these initiatives to hijack the scholarly review system were apparently orchestrated by companies that first helped authors compose or improve their scientific articles and sold them favorable peer testimonials.4 BioMed Central conducted a comprehensive investigation of most their recently published articles and identified 43 that were published based on testimonials from fabricated reviewers.